Какой подход разный к тому, что на ауках проскакивает фейк время от времени:

areich:

I don't see the problem, I don't doubt that if I bought a fake in Gemini, I'd get my
money back, even years later.

Lloyd T:

It  is a very slippery slope you are creating in this approach. In effect it transfer a
large part of the onus of responsibility for authenticity and financial risk to the buyer.
Taken to its logical conclusion, it makes the  community of buyers responsible for
weeding out fakes and greatly lessens, if not removes, the onus of responsibility for
the confirmation authenticity from the vendor. 

The vendor stands greatly to benefit by simply standing behind the money back
guarantee while taking little or not  time and effort to confirm authenticity of offerings.
The latter is a costly and time consuming exercise for the vendor, which if left to the
purchaser, as is implicit in your approach, transfers the cost and risk to the purchaser.
Moreover, the vendor knows that the onus of proof then falls on the purchaser and that
only a small proportion of the latter have the experience, means and wherewithal to
make the case of lack of authenticity, sufficient to secure the refund.

areich - МИНУС 100!
Lloyd T - ПЛЮС 1000!!!